Die Beeld het ten sterkste beswaar gemaak oor onderstaande deur dit as
"gemorspos" af te maak. Maar die punt is - is dit?
RAPPORT/ SUNDAY TIMES
BEELD
HUISGENOOT/ YOU
LANDBOU WEEKBLAD
SARIE
FARMERS WEEKLY
SON/SUN
Hierdie tydskrifte en koerante diskrimineer teen hulle eie lesers,
veral die Afrikaanssprekendes :
ek wou verlede Donderdag (25/01) advertensie plaas om die Blanke
Ekonomiese Forum teen R15 000-00
by Beeld te adverteer. Die verkoopsdame het my egter ingelig dat Johan
Vosloo (hoofbestuurder) en
Peet Kruger (redakteur) besluit het dat die inligting te sensitief is
om geplaas te word. Ek het gevra of
hulle advertensie van die "Black Management Forum" sou aanvaar en sy
het gesê: "Natuurlik".
Dit is blatante diskriminasie teen blankes! Rapport het reeds te kenne
gegee dat hulle niks van ons inisiatiewe
wil weet nie en Huisgenoot het luidkeels verkondig dat blankes nie
aandele in Media 24 kan koop nie.
My vraag is: WIE KOOP HIERDIE TYDSKRIFTE EN KOERANTE? Natuurlik is dit
die blankes!
Ons ondersteuning is goed genoeg maar ons mag niks publiseer waarby
ons kan baat vind nie.
Dit is verkeerd en ontneem ons van ons reg om op nasionale vlak te
kommunikeer.
HIERDIE BLATANTE DISKRIMINASIE TEEN BLANKES MOET STOP!
DAAROM VRA EK DAT U ALMAL HIERDIE GESKRIFTE BOIKOT.
MOENIE DIT LANGER KOOP NIE TOT VERDERE KENNIS-GEWING. "
Steve Hofmeyr
Mense, kan ons vir 'n tweede keer (eerste keer - Sheldean Human) -
bymekaar staan
om die diskriminasie teen blankes deur blankes stop te sit?????!!!! !
Ons almal mor & kla, maar staan ons regtig bymekaar soos EEN, wanneer
dit kom by
"SAAM STAAN"? Oor en oor is bewys die afgelope 10jaar (amper 11jr),
wat
reggekry word met mense wat met oorgawe "SAAM STAAN"!!!!!! !!
Komaan vriende..... ... laat ons sien of "SAAM STAAN" nog WEL vir
blankes iets beteken!!!!
pr...@yahoogroups.com
Kom ons sien of Mbweni die ding gaan reg maak.
Trader vic is dood reg met sy analise van die SA CAD.
Hou lager Mbweni wag , hou harder gaan ons val
Till 'def' do us part
27/03/2007 08:01
By: Vic de Klerk
Print story on
Email Story
South Africans spend more
Dire need for savings culture
Lesson for SA is to save more
C/A deficit a blow for rates
C/A deficit swells to 7.8%
Shock and horror
A LARGE DEFICIT on the current account of the balance of payments in
the past always worried me as an investor in listed shares. There was
too close a correlation between the direction of the deficit and the
price: earnings multiple at which the shares were trading.
Even just the turnaround of a surplus on the current account to a
deficit in the past caused a fall in the p:e at which shares were
trading. Of course, the fall of a p:e means that share prices fall.
South Africa not only has a large deficit on the current account of
its balance of payments but in the fourth quarter of 2006 the country
also had a huge, unhealthy, structurally dangerous, unprecedented -
and call it other names if you like - deficit of an annualised R143bn,
or 7.8% of SA's gross domestic product.
In the past, especially when we were still isolated from the rest of
the world's money markets, a 3% deficit on the GDP made me so nervous
that I exchanged the broking industry for farming.
Bull market of '69
That fear of a current account deficit dates from 1969. For those who
don't remember: between 1964 and 1969, SA experienced a huge bull
market in the prices of industrial shares. During the course of that
bull market the then Rand Daily Mail's index for industrial shares -
the JSE didn't have its own index yet - rose by nearly 400%.
One of my first duties when I entered the Johannesburg financial world
in 1969 was to keep a weekly graph of SA's foreign exchange reserves
up to date - by hand. Yes, at that time SA's gross foreign exchange
reserves were announced weekly.
For years the graph, with crosses for increases and circles for falls,
just went up and down in line with the share prices. The reserves rose
mainly because SA had a surplus on its current account.
There wasn't much of an inflow of foreign capital in those days.
Sharpeville was still vivid in people's memories; in any case, SA had
strict foreign exchange control on foreign investors.
The big drop
Then suddenly - from May 1969, and especially June and July of that
year - the weekly graph showed more falls than rises in our forex
reserves. Then, without understanding the contexts properly, I
overheard discussions on the floor - which were shared by the
investment analysts, portfolio managers, traders and our small
economics division on one side - that share prices were no longer
rising. In fact, they began falling.
The reserves fell further, followed by further falls in share prices.
But the faces, especially of the management of our merchant bank, fell
the furthest of all. It was clear that most of them were insolvent, as
the merchant bank's share price fell too far below the price at which
they were obliged to take up options.
That was around 1970, 1971. The reserves still fell, because SA had a
current account deficit. In fact, things only began improving from the
middle of 1976 when the gold price started climbing slowly.
In the following years my colleagues at the then PLJ Financial
Services, now Thebe Securities, and I carefully followed the country's
current account surplus as an important medium-term indicator of what
could be expected of the share prices.
But just as with any good indicator that suddenly no longer works you
quickly forget your good habits.
Investment vs saving
Our current account surplus disappeared back in the second quarter of
2003 and became a deficit. That coincides almost exactly with the
start of the current strong bull market in shares. Luckily, over the
past few years my former colleague Lafras van Rensburg, who is still
with Thebe, and I completely forgot about our fears concerning a
current account deficit.
Nevertheless, it's something that keeps sticking in the back of my
mind - even though (Reserve Bank governor) Tito Mboweni assures us
regularly that the inflow of capital and the level of reserves are
quite sufficient to cover the present current account deficit.
The student who wonders why there's a correlation between the current
account deficit and share prices would be well advised to take a look
at the latest SA Reserve Bank Quarterly Bulletin. The table on page S
124, which deals with the financing of gross capital formation, shows
that SA's gross capital formation was R350bn last year. However, the
country's gross savings were only R239bn.
Investment therefore exceeded savings by R111bn - exactly equal to our
balance of payments current account deficit for that full year. In
2006, that deficit was comfortably covered by the inflow of all kinds
of capital.
Pain of rising rates
My longstanding fear of a current account deficit and its effect on
share prices rests on the simple supply-and-demand principle.
Investment can't exceed savings forever, especially not at 7.8% of
GDP.
Savings - specifically, personal savings - just have to increase from
the current negative levels. That can only happen if personal spending
is lowered. And for that drastic measures are required, such as a
significant increase in interest rates.
Trader Vic asked Mboweni as far back as April of last year for a two-
percentage point increase in the repo rate. So far, we've had two
little steps of 0.5 percentage points each.
The time has come for a full percentage point increase in the cost of
credit. It's now necessary for the new class of consumer who has only
recently discovered the wonderful pleasure of plentiful credit - and
also the rest of the interest cycle - to learn about the pain of
rising interest rates.
ANC deputy president Jacob Zuma is meeting a group of prominent
Afrikaners in Johannesburg on Monday evening to discuss Afrikaner
issues.
Organiser for the meeting, Liesl Gottert said it was a private meeting
hosted by De Kat magazine publisher Elzilda Becker.
Those expected to attend include writer Dan Roodt, Solidarity's Kallie
Kriel, movie maker Leon Schuster, singer Steve Hofmeyr, photographer
Paul Alberts, actress Brumilda van Rensburg, a representative from the
Pro-Afrikaanse Aksiegroep, Sean Else, who co-wrote the song De la Rey,
and the Pendoring awards founder, writer Wilma de Bruin.
"It is people who specifically wanted to see him (Zuma) and who are
taking Afrikaner issues quite seriously," said Gottert. - Sapa
Die Johannesburgse metropolisie het die dag 'n vét kans gevat toe
hulle mev. Erika Swanepoel wederregtelik by 'n padblokkade in hul wit
bussie geprop het. Sy het bewys wat baie vóór en ná haar nog net die
moed gehad het om onderlangs oor te mor.
Swanepoel het onlangs met 'n breë glimlag by die Johannesburgse
landdroshof uitgestap nadat sy 'n siviele saak teen die metropolisie
gewen het. Sy het hulle vir R100 000 gedagvaar nadat sy wederregtelik
in hegtenis geneem is.
Die saak is buite die hof geskik. Swanepoel wil egter nie die
skikkingsbedrag bekend maak nie. "Dit maak nie saak nie - dit maak wel
saak dat ek gewen het. Hulle het skuld erken deur buite die hof te
skik," sê sy.
Sy het ook die minister van veiligheid en sekuriteit gedagvaar, maar
dié saak laat vaar weens die uitgawes wat so 'n saak vir haar sou
inhou.
Toe Swanepoel op 30 Mei 2005 by 'n kruising tussen Lenasia en
Kliprivier voorgekeer is, kon sy nie dink dat sy in 'n oorvol sel in
die Johannesburg-sentraal-polisiekantoor sou beland nie. Nadat die
metropolisielid egter Swanepoel se rybewys geskandeer het, het dinge
begin skeefloop.
Swanepoel is sonder 'n dagvaarding saam met ander "oortreders" in 'n
bussie geprop vir 'n uitstaande boete.
Dié boete het sy egter reeds in Maart 2003 betaal, maar dit het nie op
die polisie se stelsel gewys nie.
Toe haar man vyf uur later die bewys van betaling bring, was die
metropolisielid se antwoord glo "dis nie geldig nie; ek kan dit nie
lees nie". Hulle moes 'n skulderkenningsboete van R300 plus die
"uitstaande boete" van R200 op die plek betaal.
Ná dié vernedering is Swanepoel op 'n soektog gestuur vir haar motor,
wat sonder haar toestemming van die toneel tot by die metropolisie se
kantore in Lovedaystraat bestuur is.
Swanepoel sou ook later uitvind slegs R200 van die R500 wat sy betaal
het, het 'n maand ná haar inhegtenisneming op die metropolisie se
stelsel gewys.
Sy wou op aandrang van haar prokureur seker maak die stelsel wys sy
het betaal, maar moes uitvind háár kwitansienommer vir R500 verskil
van dié op die stelsel wat wys slegs R200 is inbetaal.
Met dít alles agter die rug, sê Swanepoel so ewe: "Ek was ook nou in
die tronk . . . been there, done it."
Die Johannesburgse metropolisie het die dag 'n vét kans gevat toe
hulle mev. Erika Swanepoel wederregtelik by 'n padblokkade in hul wit
bussie geprop het. Sy het bewys wat baie vóór en ná haar nog net die
moed gehad het om onderlangs oor te mor.
Swanepoel het onlangs met 'n breë glimlag by die Johannesburgse
landdroshof uitgestap nadat sy 'n siviele saak teen die metropolisie
gewen het. Sy het hulle vir R100 000 gedagvaar nadat sy wederregtelik
in hegtenis geneem is.
Die saak is buite die hof geskik. Swanepoel wil egter nie die
skikkingsbedrag bekend maak nie. "Dit maak nie saak nie - dit maak wel
saak dat ek gewen het. Hulle het skuld erken deur buite die hof te
skik," sê sy.
Sy het ook die minister van veiligheid en sekuriteit gedagvaar, maar
dié saak laat vaar weens die uitgawes wat so 'n saak vir haar sou
inhou.
Toe Swanepoel op 30 Mei 2005 by 'n kruising tussen Lenasia en
Kliprivier voorgekeer is, kon sy nie dink dat sy in 'n oorvol sel in
die Johannesburg-sentraal-polisiekantoor sou beland nie. Nadat die
metropolisielid egter Swanepoel se rybewys geskandeer het, het dinge
begin skeefloop.
Swanepoel is sonder 'n dagvaarding saam met ander "oortreders" in 'n
bussie geprop vir 'n uitstaande boete.
Dié boete het sy egter reeds in Maart 2003 betaal, maar dit het nie op
die polisie se stelsel gewys nie.
Toe haar man vyf uur later die bewys van betaling bring, was die
metropolisielid se antwoord glo "dis nie geldig nie; ek kan dit nie
lees nie". Hulle moes 'n skulderkenningsboete van R300 plus die
"uitstaande boete" van R200 op die plek betaal.
Ná dié vernedering is Swanepoel op 'n soektog gestuur vir haar motor,
wat sonder haar toestemming van die toneel tot by die metropolisie se
kantore in Lovedaystraat bestuur is.
Swanepoel sou ook later uitvind slegs R200 van die R500 wat sy betaal
het, het 'n maand ná haar inhegtenisneming op die metropolisie se
stelsel gewys.
Sy wou op aandrang van haar prokureur seker maak die stelsel wys sy
het betaal, maar moes uitvind háár kwitansienommer vir R500 verskil
van dié op die stelsel wat wys slegs R200 is inbetaal.
Met dít alles agter die rug, sê Swanepoel so ewe: "Ek was ook nou in
die tronk . . . been there, done it."
'n Johannesburger wat kwaad was oor swak dienslewering het vandeesweek
'n toespraak onderbreek wat mnr. Mbhazima Shilowa, Gauteng se premier,
op Menseregtedag in Sharpeville gehou het.
'n Paar dae gelede het die maatskappy SA Brouerye (SAB) aangekondig hy
oorweeg dit om sy fabriek in Polokwane, Limpopo se hoofstad, te sluit
omdat daar probleme met die lewering van dienste is - onder meer
water.
Polokwane se munisipaliteit blameer 'n tekort en hoë verbruik, maar
die plaaslike dam is voller as dieselfde tyd verlede jaar en kenners
sê dit is eerder te wyte aan swak beplanning en vrot infrastruktuur.
In Gauteng is die chaos rondom toetse vir rybewyse steeds aan die
woed. Met net 'n week oor voordat daar oorgeskakel moet word na 'n
stelsel wat probleme met burokratiese bottelnekke moet oplos, weet die
provinsiale regering nog nie hoe groot die agterstand vir besprekings
is nie.
Dit is duidelik dat owerhede groot probleme met kapasiteit het, sowel
as met interne dissipline.
Dit lyk eenvoudig asof mense wat swak diens lewer of swak bestuur (wat
swak diens tot gevolg het) keer op keer ongestraf bly.
Die resultaat is 'n klaarblyklike kultuur van swak dissipline en
dienslewering wat in die openbare sektor posvat.
> From http://www.rhodesia.nl/truthlie.htm
TRUTH DISTORTED
Between September 1984 and August 1989, 771 people were necklaced or
doused with fuel and burnt to death. The myth perpetuated by the State
then was that this was an example of African brutality. The truth we
know now, is that this repulsive form of killing was first started by
white Rhodesian security forces in the 1970s and then brought to South
Africa by the security police. ...
This outrageous statement was made by presenter Max du Preez on the
SATV programme "Truth Commission Special Report" on 9 February 1997.
The Foundation's National Chairman, Ted Sutton-Pryce, lodged a
complaint with the Broadcasting Complaints Commission of South Africa
(BCCSA) regarding this statement, which followed footage of a woman
being burnt, stoned and kicked to death by a mob in South Africa. In
his letter to the BCCSA, Mr Sutton-Pryce wrote:
As an organisation which represents the interests of former Rhodesians
who have settled in South Africa, we take strong exception to this
statement and we wish to lodge a complaint against the SABC for what
we believe to be misrepresentation of the truth. We contend that the
statement referring to "white Rhodesian security forces" above is both
untrue and malicious. Necklacing (ie. the burning to death of selected
individuals, with the aid of inflammable liquid and/or motor tyres)
was never practised (let alone started) by the Rhodesian security
forces, black or white, and would have resulted in prosecution of the
perpetrators of such a dastardly act if it were ever discovered. The
allegation casts doubt on the integrity of all former members of the
Rhodesian security forces, and causes distress for their families and
friends. Mr Du Preez gave no indication as to the source of this
"truth" that he says "we know now". Neither was there any indication
in the programme that the "truth" came from testimony presented to the
Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
FEEDBACK
The BCCSA held a hearing on 14 March, at which the FLF was represented
by Mr Gordon Munro. Mr Max du Preez was not present, but the hearing
was attended by members of the SABC's complaints and legal offices.
BCCSA Chairman Professor J.C.W. van Rooyen S.C. was not satisfied with
the SABC's response to the FLF's complaint and he called upon the SABC
to provide further evidence to justify their stand. If the BCCSA is
still not satisfied, a further hearing could be scheduled for a later
date.
As this matter is at present considered sub-judice, the FLF does not
intend making any further public statements until the case has been
dealt with by the BCCSA. But Mr Du Preez has been interviewed since
the hearing by a reporter from the Mail and Guardian (25 Feb 97). We
felt that our members, especially those who might have viewed the SATV
programme in question or read about the case in the media, should know
that the National Managing Committee is prepared to react to media
reports that are blatantly untrue and malign the Rhodesian community
in South Africa.
This complaint came to us through a concerned member. If any member
hears or reads something that denigrates the Rhodesian community
unfairly, please send details to us as soon as possible so that the
National Managing Committee can consider it and perhaps respond
appropriately.
SAPA REPORT
June 16, 1997
SABC found guilty over claim about necklacing
The Broadcasting Complaints Commission of SA announced yesterday it
had found the SABC guilty of contravening the Broadcasting Code by
reporting that necklacing was started by white Rhodesian security
forces.
The finding follows a complaint by the Flame Lily Foundation about a
statement by Truth and Reconciliation Commission special report
presenter Max du Preez about necklacing.
"The truth, as we now know, is that this repulsive form of killing was
first started by white Rhodesian security forces in the 1970s and then
brought to South Africa by the security forces," Du Preez said on TV.
The commission came to the following conclusions:
There was no evidence that the SABC or Du Preez had acted from
malicious motives.
The commission had not, however, been provided with any evidence that
the alleged atrocities in (the then) Rhodesia of the 1970s included
the incineration of live people by necklacing.
Accordingly, the statement that these forms of incineration of people
originated from the Rhodesian security forces was not substantiated.
"The commission found that the SABC contravened the Broadcasting Code.
The Flame Lily Foundation's complaint was accordingly upheld
unanimously," the commission said. - Sapa.
Interestingly, Wits, not UJ, formerly known as RAU, is the university
playing host to "Verwagtings", a new Afrikaans play written by Deirdre
Venter and directed by André Stoltz.
This is a most interesting work. Focusing, as might be expected (bad pun)
on two pregnant women, one the abandoned owner of a farm, the other the
household help whose husband is in prison, this play looks at womanhood and
how women exist not just as women but as people within their societies.
With an earthy simplicity, this work breaks through language and racial
barriers in the curious way in which women are sometime women first and only
then ethnic and racial creatures. It is in the relationships between the
women that the interest in this work lies. The actual plot moves slowly
until shortly before the end when the mystery one knew existed is suitably
and plausibly explained.
The play stars Renate Stuurman whose character name eludes me, Elton Landrew
as Martinus, Louise Make as Miriam and Deidre Venter as Magadeleen. The
characters were finely drawn and beautifully portrayed. I entered into the
authenticity of the work, never doubting that such relationships could exist
regardless of the era in which the play is set.
Unfortunately the run is too short to make the play eligible for Naledis
otherwise it would be eligible for "Best New South African Play". The sets
were excellent, the costumes appropriate and the props scene enhancing, and
one was in no doubt that one was in the home of an impoverished farmer or
'bywoner', with my inaccurate guess having been the latter.
Maar, Pretorius is nie alleen nie. Daar is ander persone,
- ja, baie verdagte persone, en groot vriende van Lets
Pretorius, - wat ook groot aandeel in Boerevryheid het.
Van hulle is as sogenaamde "moderators" aangestel, en
ander doen hulle weer op die forums voor as hoë 'gene-
raals', hoë kokkedore, 'boere staatsmanne', ensovoorts.
- Tipies dom-astrante, kinderagtige, agterlike AWB-styl.
In kort : Poepolle !
Twee van die hooffigure en stigters agter Boerevryheid
is Lets Pretorius en 'n geheimsinnige persoon wat skryf
onder die skuilnaam van "Die Ou Man" - wat erken dat
hy en Pretorius saam was die dag toe "Boerevryheid"
as webtuiste geregistreer is.
Op sommige plekke op die forums van Boerevryheid, - oa
op die draad waar Pretorius deur Jan Lamprecht ['n oud-
Rhodesiër, van "Africancrisis"] verdink word dat hy 'n agent
van die Azaniese Regering is, - antwoord Lets Pretorius vir
Lamprecht ook sommer onder die naam van "Die Ou Man".
Pretorius en Die Ou Man is dus eensgesind, eenstemmig
en boesemvriende, - aldus Die Ou Man self.
Skynregses en Akteurs op Boerevryheid :
Dit is uiters betekenisvol dat daar so 'n groot lot akteurs
en skynregses (NIA-agente) op Boerevryheid rondhang.
Kom ons kyk maar byvoorbeeld na een van Pretorius se
getroue deelnemers (karrakters / vriende) wat gereeld
op BV skryf onder die skuilnaam van "Boere Staatsman".
Eerstens is dit duidelik dat "Boere Staatsman" (staatlose,
breinlose boer-se-gat) 'n skynregse rooinek (engelsman /
hanskakie) is. Dié man sukkel om te spel ('n tipiese dom-
gat NIA-agent simptoom).
Verder is "Boere Staatsman" 'n baie swak akteur, en ek
stel voor dat NIA (Nasionale Imbesiel Agentskap) hom
eers na Hollywood terug stuur om sy akteurs-kursus te
gaan herhaal. "Boere Staatsman" máák asof hy hierdie
groot "Boer" en 'Israel-visie' -man is, - met sy al-ewige
ge-Yahweh bo, en 'n ge-Yahweh onder, - terwyl hy dit
gereeld verkeerd spel óók. Haaaa haaaa haaaaaa !
Hierdie "Boere Staatsman" is seer sekerlik een van die
(volks)vreemdste "boere" wat 'n mens kán vind, want
die man is (Pro)Engels deur-en-deur, - al drie sy web-
werwe is 100% Engels. Daarby is hy duidelik 'n mate-
rialis en 'n geldgierige kapitalis, - iemand wat geen-
sins op Jahweh vertrou nie. - 'n Leuenaar.
Hierdie "Boere Staatsman" adverteer twee webwerwe
onder sy skrywes, naamlik http://www.bigbucks.co.za
; ook http://www.mumsdream.co.za - almal opportunis-
tiese, Engelse geldmaakskemas wat "Boere Staatsman"
se ware kleure mooi wys, naamlik sy materialisme en sy
mammon-geöriënteerde lewensuitkyk. Daarby besit hy
ook 'n Versekeringsmakelaar -besigheid met die naam
"Multisure", met webwerf : http://www.multisure.co.za .
Hier onderaan word die besonderhede van die eienaar
van al drie hierdie webwerwe verskaf.
Verder is "Boere Staatsman" se optede tipies dié van 'n
regte NIA-opstoker en 'n verspreider van disinformasie.
Geen wonder nie : Hy was ook dié einste een wat die
eerste van daardie valse Uhuru-poste op Boerevryheid
geplaas het, naamlik dat Mandela kwansuis in die hospi-
taal opgeneem sou wees. - Dit maak sin en is te ver-
wagte, - tipiese dinge wat NIA agente doen. Skuim !
Verder is dit bekend dat baie agente / informante wat
vir NIA werk óók werksaam is in die Versekeringsbedryf.
Hulle word gewerf juis sodat daar gebruik gemaak kan
word van hulle ervare en gepoleerde 'people skills', as-
ook hulle glibberige en geslepe 'salesman-talente'. Hulle
werk meestal op kommissie, - naamlik hulle word betaal
om te lieg en te mislei (met daardie slinkse 'salesman'
opleiding), om te infiltreer, disinformasie te verskaf en
om inligting in te win, en om as "agents-provocateurs"
op te tree. In Kort : Hulle doen omtrent enige iets vir
goeie geld. En amper almal wéét hoe 'n 'salesman' kan
lieg !
'n WOIS navraag verskaf die inligting en die eienaar van
al drie die bostaande webwerwe van "Boere Staatsman" :
Wanneer iemand (te veel) lastige vrae vra, enige kritiek
teen Boerevryheid (op hulle forums) loods, hulle mense,
'generaals' of 'moderators' kritiseer of lastig val, ens, -
dán ontvang mens vinnig 'n half dreigende E-Pos vanaf
'n ene nico...@detectives.co.za , naamlik dat hulle no-
tisie geneem het van jou skrywes / kritiek, en dat hul-
le nie jou menings waardeer nie, en dat hulle jou sal on-
dersoek, dophou of vervolg, sou hulle voel dat jy hulle
"bedreig". Ha ha ha ! Thieth-thokken-thog ! - Ons pith
nou in onth broeke van vreeth !
NIA het vele front-organisasies, en iemand deel my mee
dat http://www.detectives.co.za óók een van hulle is.
Daarom beskerm hulle die belange van Lets Pretorius se
New-Age-Boerevryheid met letter, hand en tand. Nogal
vreemd dat 'n 'besigheid' só openlik en 'vreesloos' agter
Lets Pretorius se "Boeremag" staan, of hoe ?
Nou begin ons by die lekkerrrr dele kom ...
Die 'beginsels' van die hooffigure van Boerevryheid :
LETS PRETORIUS (STOFFEL) VERKLAAR -
... in sy tuisblad-skrywe oor die Israelwaarheid :
"Ons leef tans in die 2000 jaar tydperk van die Water-
draer wanneer die Christus weer sal kom, om vir die vol-
gende esoteriese tydperk die Geestelike leier te wees. In
die "Witboek van El Daoud" word daar verwys na 'God se
tuiniers of te wel God se boere' wat tydens hierdie Water-
draer tydperk as volgelinge en dissipels sal optree om in
sy TUIN (die herstel van die Paradys situasie) te werk."
Let op na Lets Pretorius se verwysing na subtiele okkul-
tiese terme soos "esoteriese tydperk" en "tydperk van die
Waterdraer", asook sy openlike, kritieklose en gemaklike
verwysing na "Die Witboek van El Daoud".
Die Witboek en Boerevryheid -
Soos genoem, is "Die Ou Man" 'n goeie vriend (regter
hand) van Lets Pretorius, en ook 'n mede stigter van
Boerevryheid.
Voorheen het "Die Ou Man" gereeld op Stormfront ge-
skryf, waar hy ook oa verklaar het dat hy en Lets Pre-
torius inderdaad baie goeie vriende is, en hoe hulle te-
same die Boerevryheid -webwerf gestig het. Dit ver-
klaar natuurlik Pretorius se ooglopende simpatie (voor-
liefde) vir die "Witboek van El Daoud". Ook omtrent al
die sogenaamde 'groot generaals', 'modereerders' en
'oud-gunstelinge' van Boerevryheid is groot Witboek-
aanhangers ; - soos bv : 'Vicky', 'Stefanus', 'Piett',
'Knipmes', 'Twaksak', 'Dié Boer', Dr Tobie Louw, ens,
...asook die res van hulle maats is tog só liefdevol,
neutraal, verdraagsaam en/of positief teenoor die
Witboekers met hulle sataniese New-Age filosofie.
Op pos 1561 van die Witboek bespreking op BV, sê
Pretorius (Stoffel) "amen" op 'Die Ou Man' se weer-
gawe van hoe die Bybel slegs relatief-waaragtig is,
waarop Pretorius verder as volg uitbrei, en duidelik
sy okkultiese New Age filosofie ontbloot :
"Dit is dan net logies dat ons ENIGE twee, drie of tien
godsdienste neem, al is hulle tans millenniums uitme-
kaar, en jy sou terugbeweeg op die geskiedenis lyn,
MOET jy uiteindelik by DIESELFDE WAARHEIDSBRON
uitkom."
Dus, volgens Lets Pretorius lei alle gelowe op die ein-
de van die dag tog maar na "Een God". - Dít is die es-
sensie van die okkultiese New Age geloof - 'n sata-
niese filosofie.
Lets Pretorius & Kie is dus navolgers en verkondigers
van die okkulte, die New-Age, onverdunde afgodery,
die Theosophical Society, en die Vrymesselary. - Al
hierdie genoemde dinge is alles vertakkinge van sa-
tanisme. Lets Pretorius en sy Boerevryheid-Witboek-
bende is dus direk en/of indirek betrokke satanisme.
- En dít versterk die vermoede dat hulle agente van
die sataniese NIA, (die Azaniese Regering) ens, is, -
almal óók satansdienaars. - Dienaars van Satan se
tydelike, rebelse koninkryk op aarde.
Presies waaraan glo "Die Ou Man" van Boerevryheid ?
1) Die Bybel is nie die Woord van God nie. Dit is die woord
van mense oor God. Die Witboek lê glo die 'geheime' van
die Bybel uit sodat ons die Bybel korrek kan verstaan.
2) Die Bybel bevat baie teenstrydighede. Maar die waar-
heid lê wel iewers daarin opgesluit. - Die Witboek kan al
daardie waarhede aan ons bekend maak en verduidelik.
3) Aan God die Vader, God die Moeder en God die Seun,
as die drie-Enige God.
4) Dat elke (alle) gelowe op aarde saligheid aan elke volk
(ras) kan bring. Dat elke volk dus sy saligheid deur sy eie
profete sal verwesenlik. Alle gelowe lei dus na die "skep-
pergod".
5) In reïnkarnasie. Die konsep is glo Bybels.
6) Dat Jahweh nie die Allerhoogste is nie, maar slegs een
van vele demi-gode, wat deur 'n onbekende (naamlose)
"skeppergod" [wie hy noem "die god van hemel en aarde"]
geskape is. Die Ou Man onderskei dus tussen die "skepper-
god" en tussen Jahweh as twee verskillende weses (enti-
teite).
7) Dat Allah (die Moslems se god) en Jahwe dieselfde god
(een en dieselfde persoon) is.
8) Dat Jahweh (= Allah) ondergeskik is aan die naamlose
"skepper-god" (die "god van hemel en aarde").
9) Jahweh was deur hierdie sg "almagtige skeppergod" ('n
naamlose god) aangestel as die God van die Israeliete.
10) Adam is al die mense op aarde se Vader-Koning. Hy is
die "eerste seun van God" wat geskape is (deur die "skep-
pergod"). Adam het op geen stadium gesondig nie. Hy was
glo God se oudste kind en in die geestes realm.
11) Jesus Christus is dus nie God nie, want jy kan nie God
wees en terselfdertyd langs God staan nie.
12) Jesus Christus het vir niemand gesterf nie. In teendeel,
hy het op geen stadium gesterf nie. - Dit is menslike terme.
Hy, die geestelike Wese, wat lank reeds was, het bloot ty-
delik die kledingstuk, genoem liggaam in ons taal, aangetrek
om in opdrag van sy Vader (die skeppergod) 'n taak op Aar-
de te kom verrig. Die "sterf vir my sondes" oefening was dus
futiel. Dit is juis waar Jesus Christus se boodskap vir eeue
glo verkeerd aan ons oorgedra is. Jesus het nie vir ons ge-
sterf nie.
13) Die Ou Man vra of (suggereer dat) God (Jahweh) eintlik
'n moordenaar is deurdat Hy sy Seun (Christus) laat vermoor
het. Hiermee suggereer hy dat die kruisiging 'n wanvoorstel-
ling en 'n misdadige misverstand is.
OPDRAG AAN AL DIE VOLKERE VAN DIE AARDE -
VOLGENS DIE OU MAN :
"My opdrag aan die volkere van die wereld genaamd die
aarde, is dievolgende : -
Laat Indie en China saam met al die ander oosterse volke
wat sulke kosbare strale van die een groot lig van waarheid
besit, die ware grond beginsels van die geloof wat eens aan
hulle vadere toevertrou was met ywer ondersoek.
Laat Israel en Juda dieselfde doen, sodat hulle weer die in-
gewyde woorde van Moses wat in die ingewyde taal gele-
wer is, kan volg.
Laat hulle jaloesie vermy wat geleer is in Egypte waar se-
kere tempelpriesterskappe toe reeds die profete begin ver-
ag het, en terwyl hulle hierdie groot dwaling vermy, laat
hulle weer saam span en as broers opgaan na die stad van
getroues, wat nie met hande gebou is nie. En laat diegene
wat Islam volg, ook hul geloof reinig en luister na die woorde
van hulle eie groot profeet/leermeester en nie na die wat sy
betekenis verkeerd begryp nie, net soos soortgelyke foute
begaan is deur andere wat of aangelas het by dit wat hulle
ingewyde leiers bedoel het of dit verkeerd vertaal het.
Laat die etlike leermeesters van die weste van wat tans
bekend staan as die nuwe (Theosophical) denk rigting, in
al die vertakkings daarvan (New Age), toesien dat hulle
altyd die gedagtes van God onderrig en nie slegs wat hul-
le dink daardie gedagtes moet wees nie, baie van wat hul-
le bekend maak is inderdaad afkomstig van die aller oudste
goddellike wysheid..."
Die Ou Man verklaar verder die volgende [JW12 se
kommentaar in hakies] :
a) Bhoedisme is die Oosterlinge se weg na saligheid.
[Onbybels, New-Age, Theosophical Society].
b) Jesus Christus het om die volgende redes gekom :
Om as geestelike verlosser die liefde en teerheid van God
weer eens in die gedagtes van die mensdom vas te lê.
Om die mensdom voor te berei op die koms van die Vader-
Koning, naamlik Adam. [Totaal onbybels].
Om die byna vergete en grootliks wanbegrepe goddelike
wyshede te laat herleef. [New Age, okkulties].
En om die mensdom te help om hulself te bevry van die sla-
werny deur eiesinnigheid, en om sodoende die tyd wanneer
die liggaam van skaamte nie langer nodig sou wees nie, te
verhaas. [New-Age, Theosophical Society].
c) Jesus het nie gekom om te sterf nie, want hy het nie.
Jesus het gekom om vir my te sê dat die koninkryk van God
binne my is. As ek besef wat die implikasie is van dit wat Je-
sus kom sê het, en ek gaan lees Genesis weer, dan is ek be-
vry. Want ek was substans van God, lank voor Israel. [Las-
terlik, Allegories, New-Age].
Ras is nêrens ter sprake nie. [New-Age, Theosophical
Society, Liberalisme].
Want 'n stralekind kan nie in terme van aardse terminologie
beperk word nie. [New Age, Okkulties].
As ek myself as Israeliet beskou, plaas ek 'n geweldige be-
perking op myself en misken ek Jesus se boodskap. [Totaal
onbybels].
d) Dat die hemelkoningin van Jer. 44:16 dui op die moeder-
gedeelte van die drie-enige God (van die Bybel). Haar naam
is Asherah (Eva). [Lasterlik, Okkulties, New-Age, Theosophi-
cal Society].
[Let Wel : Asherah, Astarte, Semiramis en Osiris is dieselfde
afgod, - wat ook in die Bybel genoem word].
e) Dat Adam ons "Vader-Koning", en Eva ons "Moeder-koning"
is. [Okkulties, New-Age, Theosophical Society].
f) Die Bybel is nie die Woord van God nie. Dit is die woord
van mense oor God. [Humanisties, New-Age, Onbybels].
g) Jahweh en Allah is dieselfde God. [New-Age, Lasterlik,
Onbybels].
h) Jahweh is as Heer van die Israeliete aangestel deur die
Almagtige, Skepper van hemel en aarde. [Lasterlik, Onby-
bels].
i) Daar was 'n aantal gode waarvan Jahweh een was.
j) Jahweh en die ander gode is onder gesag van die Aller-
hoogste. [Lasterlik, Onbybels].
k) Die Allerhoogste plaas elke god in bevel van 'n spesi-
fieke nasie. [Onbybels, Lasterlik].
l) Jahweh se porsie is die Israeliete. [Allegories].
m) Jahweh is die Heer van die Israeliete, maar hy is nie
die Allerhoogste nie. [Lasterlik, Onbybels].
n) Ons hoef ons nie meer as Semiete voor te doen om
toegang tot die erfdeel te hê nie. Die Semiete is die erf-
deel van Jahweh. Die "boere" mag Jahweh 'sidestep' en
reguit na die "skepper-god" gaan en sodoende die konin-
kryk beërwe. [Lasterlik, Onbybels, Okkulties].
o) Jahweh het "verraad" teenoor die regverdige Job ge-
pleeg om daardeur net 'n punt teen satan te bewys, -
en daarom is Jahweh nie die Skepper (Allerhoogste) nie.
[Lasterlik].
p) Die ou man ondersteun blykbaar die idee agter die
"Da Vinci Code". [Onbybels].
q) Hoe gouer die wetenskap geloof finaal diskrediteer,
hoe beter. Want die wetenskap wys aan ons dat God
nie deur geloof en sy dogmatiek ingeperk kan word nie.
[Allegories, Onbybels].
r) Die Skepper van die Heelal is nie 'n persoon nie. Hy
stoei nie. Hy "brag" nie by die Duiwel oor sy getroue
Job, net om Job te verraai nie. Net sodat hy die Dui-
wel 'n punt kan bewys nie. [New-Age, lasterlik].
Hoe Die Ou Man die Bybel verdraai :
Deut. 32: 8 (Die Ou Man se verdraaiiing daarvan) -
"When the Elyon apportioned the nations, when he
divided humankind, he fixed the boundaries of the
peoples according to the number of the gods; Yah-
weh's own portion was his people, Jacob his alloted
share."
Hier is hoe die korrekte weergawe klink :
Deut. 32: 8 : "When the most High divided to the na-
tions their inheritance, when he separated the sons of
Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to
the number of the children of Israel." (KJV).
Die Ou Man se verklaring van Exod. 3: 2-7 ; 14-15 :
1) Jahweh is die god wat met Moses gepraat het.
2) Satan was die een wat Farao se hart verhard het.
3) Die Vader-God (Skepper) is bo hulle.
4) Jesus is die seun van die skepper-god en ook van
die mens (Adam), maar nie die seun van Jahweh nie.
Aanhaling van Die Ou Man :
"Om te sê dat Jesus uit die stam van Juda is, is om te
sê dat 'n vlinder 'n wurm is!"
Wat sê die Bybel :
Hebr. 7: 14 : "Want dit is volkome duidelik dat onse Here
uit Juda voortgespruit het, en met betrekking tot hierdie
stam het Moses niks gesê van die priesterskap nie."
Openb. 5: 5 : "Toe sê een van die ouderlinge vir my :
Moenie ween nie ; kyk, die Leeu wat uit die stam van
Juda is, die wortel van Dawid, het oorwin om die boek
oop te maak en sy sewe seëls te breek."
Wat Die Ou Man verklaar oor die Voortrekkers :
"Toe die manne voor die eerste skote op 16 Desember
agter die lanterns gelê en wag het, was hulle reeds in-
gebind in 'n ooreenkoms met God die Skepper (van die
Witboek), en nie met Jahweh van die bybel nie."
Die ou Man verklaar dus dat die Voortrekkers nie in
die God van die Bybel (Jahweh) geglo het nie, maar
wel in die New-Age god van die Theosophical Socie-
ty, oftewel, die gode van die Witboek van El Daoud.
Die Ou Man se siening van Jahweh en Abraham :
"Die Jahweh van die Ou Testament is 'n norse en soms
kinderagtige god. - Maar gelukkig is hy nie my God nie.
Hy is bloot die familie-god van die Semiete. Die God van
Abraham en sy twee seuns. Allah vir die oudste en Jah-
weh vir die jongste."
"Weereens is Jahweh nie almagtig nie, want hy moet
eers met 'n 'scheme' kom om uit te vind waar hy met
Abraham staan. Die Almagtige Skepper daarinteen
weet reeds!"
"Abraham is die grootste opportunis en kansvatter waar-
van ek nog gelees het. (Nie 'n wonder dat 3 gelowe sy
oorsprong in hom het nie!) Sy god (Jahweh) is kinderag-
tig en beslis nie my God nie. Sy broer, Lot het hom skul-
dig gemaak aan bloedskande met sy 2 dogters! Wat 'n
bisarre familie! God behoede hul nageslag!"
Heel onder aan elke skrywe op Stormfront haal die ou
man hierdie deel van die Azaniese Grondwet aan :
13. "The right of the South African people as a whole
to self-determination, as manifested in this Constitution,
does not preclude, within the framework of this right,
recognition of the notion of the right of self-determi-
nation of any community sharing a common cultural
and language heritage, within a territorial entity in
the Republic or in any other way, determined by
national legislation." SECTION 235. Chapter 1.
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CONSTITUTION.
Dít sê presies wat Die Ou Man werklik van die self-
beskikking van die blanke in Suid-Afrika dink, naam-
lik fôkkôl. Snaaks dat hy en Lets Pretorius dan sul-
ke goeie vriende is. Dit maak van die term "Boere-
vryheid" 'n bespotting en 'n klug. 'n Allegorie.
OOR DIE WITBOEK (Book of El Daoud - 1923)
Hier gaan ek die ooreenkomste tussen die Okkulte, die
New-Age, die Theosophical Society, die Vrymesselaars,
en Die Witboek uit wys, oa dmv aanhalings uit soortge-
lyke okkultiese boeke -
Witboek Aanhaling (bl. 9) :
"That of the Father-Mother God..."
Aanhaling (bl. 18) :
"Evolution commenced..."
Uit die boek : "TEACHINGS OF OSIRIS"
Teachings III - September 1925-1926
Aanhaling (bl. 91) :
"EL Daoud, the first son of the breath of the Father-
Mother, ..."
Aanhaling (bl. 108) :
"...even my beloved Twin Parents, El Daoud-Evam."
"...the will of the Father-Mother God..."
SATANISM, FREEMASONRY AND THE THEOSOPHICAL
SOCIETY
Interesting Historical Facts :
One of the 13 Satanic bloodlines that rule the world is
the Rockefeller bloodline.
David Rockefeller was part of Lucis Trust's management.
Lucis Trust puts out the book "Externalization of the Hier-
archy" by Alice Bailey, which spells out the Plan for the
Satanists, Occultists and New Agers on how the spiritual
Hierarchy (actually the demonic hierarchy) is to externa-
lize their rule of the planet.
The book gives quite a few of the details of the plan, and
is used as a textbook for New Agers at the Arcane Schools
in NY, London, and Europe on how the New Age/One World
Religion/One-World-Government will be brought in.
If anyone doubts the Rockefeller's commitment to Satan, -
read page 107 of "Externalization of the Hierarchy". On page
107, Alice Bailey, President of the Theosophical Society and
part of Lucis (formerly Lucifer) Trust, tells us who will rule
when the New Age (New World Order) takes over.
On the Earthly level - Humanity so to speak, the Ruler is
given on page 107 as being Lucifer. On the Spiritual level,
- called "Shamballa - the Holy City", the coming ruler is
quoted as "the Lord of the World", which we Christians
know is Satan.
Lucis Trust also knows that it is Satan, but for public con-
sumption they say that the "ruler of the world" is Sanat (a
scrambling of Satan) Kumara. They also predict there will
be a Christ Consciousness and the Christ (being actually
the Anti-Christ) will be revealed.
The book "Externalization of the Hierarchy" teaches re-
peatedly (see pages 511-512, 514) that the 3 vehicles
to bring in the New Age will be the Masonic Lodges, (ob-
viously not everyone attends the Masonic Lodges), next
the Churches [this is clearly revealing to us that men like
the Rockefellers (and the Rothchilds, Oppenheimers) are
using the churches for the Luciferian plan of Lucis Trust],
and finally : Education [Well, of course education. - Not
everyone attends churches. They need a back-up safety
net to catch everyone in their brainwashing to make us
all want to be happy slaves under the One-World Govern-
ment of the Light-bearer, Satan].
THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY
In 1875, the Theosophical Society was founded by Madame
Helena Blavatsky, and another occult organization, the Her-
metic Order of the Golden Dawn, twelve years later. One of
the most prominent members in the later years of the Herme-
tic Order of the Golden Dawn was Aleister Crowley, - a name
that has come to be synonymous with popular understandings
of Satanism in the 20th century.
Google : Related Occult Books -
"The New Age Bible Interpretation of the New Testament
1935". A theosophical interpretation of the New Testament.
"Transactions of the Blavatsky Lodge of the Theosophical
Society" by H. P. Blavatsky 1923.
Aanhaling (bl. 2) :
"...is called the Eternal Mother-Father..."
"and becomes what was called the Mother Goddess, from
whom proceeds the Logos, the Son and Father God at the
same time..." [Presies dieselfde geloof as van Die Ou Man].
Overall Objectives of the Theosophical Society :
The first objective of The Theosophical Society is to de-
monstrate that the oneness of all life is a fact in nature
and to form a nucleus of a universal brotherhood. This,
according to Blavatsky, is because :
(a) All men have spiritually and physically the same origin,
which is the fundamental teaching of Theosophy. (b) As
mankind is essentially of one and the same essence, and
that essence is one - infinite, uncreate, and eternal, whe-
ther we call it God or Nature - nothing, therefore, can af-
fect one nation or one man without affecting all other na-
tions and all other men. This is as certain and as obvious
as that a stone thrown into a pond will, sooner or later,
set in motion every single drop of water therein.
The Theosophical Society -
The Three Objects of the Theosophical Society :
1) To form a nucleus of the Universal Brotherhood of Hu-
manity, without distinction of race, creed, sex, caste or
colour.
2) To To encourage the study of Comparative Religion,
Philosophy and Science.
3) To investigate unexplained laws of Nature and the
powers latent in the human being.
Let Wel :
Punt (1) alleen onderskryf die leuse ('beginsels') van
liberalisme en humanisme, asook dié van die Vrymes-
selaars.
WHAT IS THEOSOPHY ? -
"The word Theosophy comes from the Greek 'theosophia'
meaning 'Divine Wisdom'."
"The most important principle of Theosophy is its presen-
tation of a holistic world-view which emphasises the unity
and interconnectedness of all life, the basic oneness of all
peoples and all species of life on earth."
"Madame Blavatsky, who gave the world Theosophy in its
modern form in the latter part of the nineteenth century,
drew together teachings from sources which included Pla-
to, Confucius, the Vedas, Gautama Buddha, Jesus, the
Kabbala, philosophers, scientists and other contemporary
thinkers of her day."
"But perhaps most importantly, a way of life is implicit in
Theosophy. It implies a regard for all life and actions, ba-
sed on an increasing realisation of our oneness with all
others."
What subjects are studied at meetings of the theoso-
phical society ?
"A considerable range of subjects is presented at meetings
of The Theosophical Society. Topics include various aspects
of theosophical teachings such as ethical living, modern sci-
ence and Theosophy, Reincarnation, Karma, teachings from
various religious and philosophical traditions, meditation and
practical aspects of spiritual living, to name a few."
Soos die leser kan sien is die Theosophical Society en die
New-Age beweging een en dieselfde sataniese organisasie.
Gaan kyk asb na die sataniese (okkultiese) embleem van
die Theosophical Society op hulle volgende Webblad :
Hier volg 'n uiteensetting van die betekenis van die
embleem (wapen) van die theosophical Society :
We shall begin with an inspection of these two symbols,
i.e. the symbol of the House of Theosophy on the left and
the symbol of the Nazi Party on the right. Notice that the
House of Theosophy symbol is the occultic Snake Eating
Its own Tail, - the Oroboros.
Immediately underneath the snake in the middle is the
Swastika ; however, the Theosophist symbol shows the
Swastika in a rotating position, so that its points are a
little off center. The Nazi Swastika is not shown rotating.
You see, the Swastika is an ancient symbol found in most
occult groups all over the world, from the Celts in Europe
to China.
The Swastika is a four-limbed cross, and is usually por-
trayed as rotating constantly. The Theosophical Society
has the swastika rotating, so its legs are slightly off cen-
ter compared to the Nazi Swastika. However, both Swas-
tikas portray the identical meaning of "luck" and of "rein-
carnation" [Dr. C. Burns, Masonic and Occult Symbols,
page 19, and 241].
"The perfect equilibrium of spirit and matter is symbolized
by the six-pointed star, which is again only another form
of the Square and Compass [Freemasonry Symbol], each
having a base-line from which to form a triangle." [Mystic
Masonry, 1913, p. 244-45]. The six-pointed star here is
the Hexagram."
Now, let us stop right here to digest what Masonic author,
Buck, has just told us. He has just told us that the hexa-
gram is only "another form of the Square and Compass, -
each having a base-line from which to form a triangle".
Let us examine closely the relation of the Satanic hexa-
gram with the Square and Compass of Freemasonry. The
Masonic Square and Compass is identical (in meaning) to
the hexagram.
Remember the words of a former witch : "When the male
triangle penetrates the female triangle, it forms the six-
pointed crest of the Seal of Solomon, or hexagram, the
most wicked symbol in witchcraft". [Dr. C. Burns, Maso-
nic and Occult Symbols, p. 39].
THE BAAL CONNECTION
Nimrod :
We find such names for this revered god (Nimrod) in scrip-
ture as Chemosh, Molock, Merodach, Remphan, Tamuz, and
Baal, to mention only a few of the some thirty-eight Biblical
titles, plus numerous representatives of these "gods". [Under
the heading of "Nimrod" found in Halley's Bible Handbook, pg.
82].
Baal worship was a form of the Old Sun Worship, for Baal
(Nimrod - as we have seen) was represented by the Sun.
Many names throughout Biblical and classical history ap-
pear and refer to Nimrod. These formed what is referred
to as the Ancient Mysteries.
The gods of Egypt :
Albert Pike [33rd degree mason], in his book "Morals &
Dogma", pg. 624, refers to the Ancient Mysteries and
Freemasonry as being identical, with exceptions found
only in that of progressive alterations.
The Connection :
Although varied countries had many gods, only certain
gods (or exalted positions) were represented by the sun
and Moon.
Found in Albert Pike's Morals & Dogma pg. 406 :
"We know that the Egyptians worshipped the Sun, under
the name of Osiris."
Mr. A. Pike connects Baal Worship and Osiris as identical.
The Legend of Osiris, the Egyptian god, is significant to
Masonry due to the ritual of the "Third Degree" as well as
other teachings which are deep-rooted in Egyptian legend.
In addition, "Osiris and Isis were the sun and Moon, is at-
tested by many ancient writers" (Morals and dogma, page
476), which, as we have seen is reference to Baal or Nim-
rod, - one of the founders of Masonry. Thus Osiris, Nimrod,
Baal, Merodach, etc, are synonymous, - that is, one and
the same.
The roots of Freemasonry lie in Egyptian Legend with re-
verence to Osiris or Baal (Nimrod), - thus becoming Baal
Worship. Not Baal worship fictitiously stated, but actual,
physical Baal Worship through ritual and appellation.
Freemasonry is not an outside influence. It is an inside
influence ! Baal Worship is still at large ! Satan is once
again using the oldest strategy in the world - Conquer
the enemy from within to best conquer him from with-
out. Secret organization within secret organization.
Since the true meaning of Freemasonry lies in its being
descended from, and a revival of, the mystery religions
of ancient Egypt, especially the worship of Isis and O-
siris, the true meanings of its symbols are sexual ! This
should not be surprising since the cult of Isis and Osiris
was a fertility (i.e. sex) cult. In plain language, - those
early pagans worshipped sex and reproductive power.
That is, (fecundity), meaning, intellectually productive.
The Occult Connection - Theosophical Society,
Satanism, Freemasonry, El Daoud (book list) -
An Index to The Occult Review 1906-1928 London,
Ralph Shirley :
OccRev y1924 v39 June p381 - review - The Book of
El-Daoud, the Father-King - anon -- Meredith Starr.
OccRev y1926 v44 December p407 - Ltte - London
Lodge of the Theosophical Society -- GHR
OPSOMMING
Kom ons kyk na die ooreenkomste tussen liberalisme
(humanisme), die Vrymesselary en die Theosophical
Society :
1) Vryheid (humanisme) -
Om te glo (en leef / doen) dat jy as mens die opper-
gesag oor jouself is, en die bepaler van jou eie lot is.
Die mens is dus sy eie 'god'.
2) Gelykheid en broederskap -
"A universal brotherhood of humanity, withou distinc-
tion of race, creed, sex, caste or colour." Hierdie sata-
niese leuse word identies in die Azaniese grondwet ver-
vat.
3) New-Age geloof -
Die verkondiging dat alle gelowe een oorsprong het
en dat alle gelowe eintlik maar dieselfde god aanbid.
4) Afgodery -
Die besoedeling van die Bybel deur vermenging (be-
smetting) van / met afgode (isis-osiris / asherah- el
daoud). Adam en Eva word hernoem na Asherah en
El Daoud, en hulle word gode-status gegee.
Boerevryheid - konneksie
Soos hier bewys is, ondersteun en onderskryf beide
Lets Pretorius en Die Ou Man hierdie Okkultiese, Sa-
taniese, New-Age 'beginsels' (van die Theosophical
Society).
"Boerevryheid" is dus (deur NIA) geskep om :
a) Te dien as "tuiste", "uitlaatklep", "weerlig-afleier" en
lok-aas vir die (dom en naïewe) regses van Suid-Afrika.
b) Subtiel te mislei, om die kleingelowiges en diegene
met relatief min kennis van die Bybel, van die Bybel af
weg te lei, deur hulle met die New-Age te korrupteer.
c) Te verdeel en as gevolg daarvan te heers, deur die
nuutgeskepte splintergroepe te 'lei', - en verder teen
die (enige) "opposisie" op te sweep (te verdeel).
d) Vrees en onsekerheid te kweek onder die naïewes
en die on-ingeligdes, - waarna hulle dan die rol van
die "leiers" en die "verlossers" speel, - deur daardie
"reddende uitkoms" aan te bied.
Mag die lesers se ogies mooi wyd oopgegaan het !
Ek vermaan die leser om van hierdie sataniese web-
werf af weg te bly. Geen ware Bybelgelowige sal by
so iets tuis voel nie.
Supertaal
Blog
Soek
Hulp
Lede
Registreer
Teken aan
Tuis
RSS
