Exodus 23:11 - Die gesaaides moet Israel in die sewende jaar op hulle lande
laat sodat die arm mense eers daarvan vir hulself kan neem, en dit wat
oorbly aan die diere van die veld.
Straf
Exodus 9:9 - (Die sesde plaag). Dit maak nie vir my sin dat God ook
vierbenige diere wat redeloos is en nie met God of die mens kan kommunikeer
nie saam met die Egiptenare sou straf nie. Ek wonder dus teen watter soort
dier God wou optree.
Gemeenskap
Levitikus 20:15-16 - Die doodstraf word opgelê waar 'n man / vrou vleeslike
gemeenskap gehad het met die dier, want hulle bloedskuld rus op hulle. Word
hier van 'n vierbenige dier gepraat. Sulke dade word tog nie met diere
gepleeg nie. En waarom sou God 'n redelose dier wat slegs op sy instinkte
handel van bloedskuld beskuldig.
Opdrag uitvoer
Exodus 19:13 - 'n Dier wat die berg met die hand aanraak? God het seker tog
nie Moses versoek om naas Israel ook ape en bobbejane te belet om nie die
berg aan te raak nie. Vir 'n dier sou so opdrag onverstaanbaar gewees het.
Woning
Jeremia 21:6 / 27:6 - Mens en dier sou aan die pes sterf. Die dier van die
veld sal aan die koning van Babel gegee word om hom te dien soos slawe. Kan
enige viervoetige dier jou dien soos 'n slaaf.
Klere
Jona 3:8 - Mens en dier moet 'n rougewaad dra, en hulle moet ernstig na God
roep. Die dier dra dus klere en beskik oor die vermoë om tot God te bid.
Onderskei van viervoetige diere
Judas 1:10 - Hulle praat sleg van goed waarvan hulle niks weet nie. Hulle
kan dus praat.
OPSOMMING
Hierdie is waarlik 'n merkwaardige dier. Hy word "wilde dier van die aarde"
genoem, en onderskei van vee en viervoetige diere. Gevolglik is dit 'n dier
met 2 bene wat gesaaides, olywe en druiwe eet. 'n Man en vrou kan met die
dier gemeenskap he. Die dier het hande en voete en woon in stede. Hulle dien
die mens en ontvang 'n loon vir hulle arbeid. Die dier maak van 'n land 'n
wildernis en kan 'n mens virhinder om daar deur te gaan. Die dier kan met
mense en met God kommunikeer en berou toon oor sy sonde. Verder kan die dier
alles belaster waarvan hy niks weet nie.
Die vraag ontstaan of die diere vandag nog uitgeken kan word. Indien wel,
wie het die moed om dit te doen.
Die Beeld het ten sterkste beswaar gemaak oor onderstaande deur dit as
"gemorspos" af te maak. Maar die punt is - is dit?
RAPPORT/ SUNDAY TIMES
BEELD
HUISGENOOT/ YOU
LANDBOU WEEKBLAD
SARIE
FARMERS WEEKLY
SON/SUN
Hierdie tydskrifte en koerante diskrimineer teen hulle eie lesers,
veral die Afrikaanssprekendes :
ek wou verlede Donderdag (25/01) advertensie plaas om die Blanke
Ekonomiese Forum teen R15 000-00
by Beeld te adverteer. Die verkoopsdame het my egter ingelig dat Johan
Vosloo (hoofbestuurder) en
Peet Kruger (redakteur) besluit het dat die inligting te sensitief is
om geplaas te word. Ek het gevra of
hulle advertensie van die "Black Management Forum" sou aanvaar en sy
het gesê: "Natuurlik".
Dit is blatante diskriminasie teen blankes! Rapport het reeds te kenne
gegee dat hulle niks van ons inisiatiewe
wil weet nie en Huisgenoot het luidkeels verkondig dat blankes nie
aandele in Media 24 kan koop nie.
My vraag is: WIE KOOP HIERDIE TYDSKRIFTE EN KOERANTE? Natuurlik is dit
die blankes!
Ons ondersteuning is goed genoeg maar ons mag niks publiseer waarby
ons kan baat vind nie.
Dit is verkeerd en ontneem ons van ons reg om op nasionale vlak te
kommunikeer.
HIERDIE BLATANTE DISKRIMINASIE TEEN BLANKES MOET STOP!
DAAROM VRA EK DAT U ALMAL HIERDIE GESKRIFTE BOIKOT.
MOENIE DIT LANGER KOOP NIE TOT VERDERE KENNIS-GEWING. "
Steve Hofmeyr
Mense, kan ons vir 'n tweede keer (eerste keer - Sheldean Human) -
bymekaar staan
om die diskriminasie teen blankes deur blankes stop te sit?????!!!! !
Ons almal mor & kla, maar staan ons regtig bymekaar soos EEN, wanneer
dit kom by
"SAAM STAAN"? Oor en oor is bewys die afgelope 10jaar (amper 11jr),
wat
reggekry word met mense wat met oorgawe "SAAM STAAN"!!!!!! !!
Komaan vriende..... ... laat ons sien of "SAAM STAAN" nog WEL vir
blankes iets beteken!!!!
pr...@yahoogroups.com
Kom ons sien of Mbweni die ding gaan reg maak.
Trader vic is dood reg met sy analise van die SA CAD.
Hou lager Mbweni wag , hou harder gaan ons val
Till 'def' do us part
27/03/2007 08:01
By: Vic de Klerk
Print story on
Email Story
South Africans spend more
Dire need for savings culture
Lesson for SA is to save more
C/A deficit a blow for rates
C/A deficit swells to 7.8%
Shock and horror
A LARGE DEFICIT on the current account of the balance of payments in
the past always worried me as an investor in listed shares. There was
too close a correlation between the direction of the deficit and the
price: earnings multiple at which the shares were trading.
Even just the turnaround of a surplus on the current account to a
deficit in the past caused a fall in the p:e at which shares were
trading. Of course, the fall of a p:e means that share prices fall.
South Africa not only has a large deficit on the current account of
its balance of payments but in the fourth quarter of 2006 the country
also had a huge, unhealthy, structurally dangerous, unprecedented -
and call it other names if you like - deficit of an annualised R143bn,
or 7.8% of SA's gross domestic product.
In the past, especially when we were still isolated from the rest of
the world's money markets, a 3% deficit on the GDP made me so nervous
that I exchanged the broking industry for farming.
Bull market of '69
That fear of a current account deficit dates from 1969. For those who
don't remember: between 1964 and 1969, SA experienced a huge bull
market in the prices of industrial shares. During the course of that
bull market the then Rand Daily Mail's index for industrial shares -
the JSE didn't have its own index yet - rose by nearly 400%.
One of my first duties when I entered the Johannesburg financial world
in 1969 was to keep a weekly graph of SA's foreign exchange reserves
up to date - by hand. Yes, at that time SA's gross foreign exchange
reserves were announced weekly.
For years the graph, with crosses for increases and circles for falls,
just went up and down in line with the share prices. The reserves rose
mainly because SA had a surplus on its current account.
There wasn't much of an inflow of foreign capital in those days.
Sharpeville was still vivid in people's memories; in any case, SA had
strict foreign exchange control on foreign investors.
The big drop
Then suddenly - from May 1969, and especially June and July of that
year - the weekly graph showed more falls than rises in our forex
reserves. Then, without understanding the contexts properly, I
overheard discussions on the floor - which were shared by the
investment analysts, portfolio managers, traders and our small
economics division on one side - that share prices were no longer
rising. In fact, they began falling.
The reserves fell further, followed by further falls in share prices.
But the faces, especially of the management of our merchant bank, fell
the furthest of all. It was clear that most of them were insolvent, as
the merchant bank's share price fell too far below the price at which
they were obliged to take up options.
That was around 1970, 1971. The reserves still fell, because SA had a
current account deficit. In fact, things only began improving from the
middle of 1976 when the gold price started climbing slowly.
In the following years my colleagues at the then PLJ Financial
Services, now Thebe Securities, and I carefully followed the country's
current account surplus as an important medium-term indicator of what
could be expected of the share prices.
But just as with any good indicator that suddenly no longer works you
quickly forget your good habits.
Investment vs saving
Our current account surplus disappeared back in the second quarter of
2003 and became a deficit. That coincides almost exactly with the
start of the current strong bull market in shares. Luckily, over the
past few years my former colleague Lafras van Rensburg, who is still
with Thebe, and I completely forgot about our fears concerning a
current account deficit.
Nevertheless, it's something that keeps sticking in the back of my
mind - even though (Reserve Bank governor) Tito Mboweni assures us
regularly that the inflow of capital and the level of reserves are
quite sufficient to cover the present current account deficit.
The student who wonders why there's a correlation between the current
account deficit and share prices would be well advised to take a look
at the latest SA Reserve Bank Quarterly Bulletin. The table on page S
124, which deals with the financing of gross capital formation, shows
that SA's gross capital formation was R350bn last year. However, the
country's gross savings were only R239bn.
Investment therefore exceeded savings by R111bn - exactly equal to our
balance of payments current account deficit for that full year. In
2006, that deficit was comfortably covered by the inflow of all kinds
of capital.
Pain of rising rates
My longstanding fear of a current account deficit and its effect on
share prices rests on the simple supply-and-demand principle.
Investment can't exceed savings forever, especially not at 7.8% of
GDP.
Savings - specifically, personal savings - just have to increase from
the current negative levels. That can only happen if personal spending
is lowered. And for that drastic measures are required, such as a
significant increase in interest rates.
Trader Vic asked Mboweni as far back as April of last year for a two-
percentage point increase in the repo rate. So far, we've had two
little steps of 0.5 percentage points each.
The time has come for a full percentage point increase in the cost of
credit. It's now necessary for the new class of consumer who has only
recently discovered the wonderful pleasure of plentiful credit - and
also the rest of the interest cycle - to learn about the pain of
rising interest rates.
ANC deputy president Jacob Zuma is meeting a group of prominent
Afrikaners in Johannesburg on Monday evening to discuss Afrikaner
issues.
Organiser for the meeting, Liesl Gottert said it was a private meeting
hosted by De Kat magazine publisher Elzilda Becker.
Those expected to attend include writer Dan Roodt, Solidarity's Kallie
Kriel, movie maker Leon Schuster, singer Steve Hofmeyr, photographer
Paul Alberts, actress Brumilda van Rensburg, a representative from the
Pro-Afrikaanse Aksiegroep, Sean Else, who co-wrote the song De la Rey,
and the Pendoring awards founder, writer Wilma de Bruin.
"It is people who specifically wanted to see him (Zuma) and who are
taking Afrikaner issues quite seriously," said Gottert. - Sapa
Die Johannesburgse metropolisie het die dag 'n vét kans gevat toe
hulle mev. Erika Swanepoel wederregtelik by 'n padblokkade in hul wit
bussie geprop het. Sy het bewys wat baie vóór en ná haar nog net die
moed gehad het om onderlangs oor te mor.
Swanepoel het onlangs met 'n breë glimlag by die Johannesburgse
landdroshof uitgestap nadat sy 'n siviele saak teen die metropolisie
gewen het. Sy het hulle vir R100 000 gedagvaar nadat sy wederregtelik
in hegtenis geneem is.
Die saak is buite die hof geskik. Swanepoel wil egter nie die
skikkingsbedrag bekend maak nie. "Dit maak nie saak nie - dit maak wel
saak dat ek gewen het. Hulle het skuld erken deur buite die hof te
skik," sê sy.
Sy het ook die minister van veiligheid en sekuriteit gedagvaar, maar
dié saak laat vaar weens die uitgawes wat so 'n saak vir haar sou
inhou.
Toe Swanepoel op 30 Mei 2005 by 'n kruising tussen Lenasia en
Kliprivier voorgekeer is, kon sy nie dink dat sy in 'n oorvol sel in
die Johannesburg-sentraal-polisiekantoor sou beland nie. Nadat die
metropolisielid egter Swanepoel se rybewys geskandeer het, het dinge
begin skeefloop.
Swanepoel is sonder 'n dagvaarding saam met ander "oortreders" in 'n
bussie geprop vir 'n uitstaande boete.
Dié boete het sy egter reeds in Maart 2003 betaal, maar dit het nie op
die polisie se stelsel gewys nie.
Toe haar man vyf uur later die bewys van betaling bring, was die
metropolisielid se antwoord glo "dis nie geldig nie; ek kan dit nie
lees nie". Hulle moes 'n skulderkenningsboete van R300 plus die
"uitstaande boete" van R200 op die plek betaal.
Ná dié vernedering is Swanepoel op 'n soektog gestuur vir haar motor,
wat sonder haar toestemming van die toneel tot by die metropolisie se
kantore in Lovedaystraat bestuur is.
Swanepoel sou ook later uitvind slegs R200 van die R500 wat sy betaal
het, het 'n maand ná haar inhegtenisneming op die metropolisie se
stelsel gewys.
Sy wou op aandrang van haar prokureur seker maak die stelsel wys sy
het betaal, maar moes uitvind háár kwitansienommer vir R500 verskil
van dié op die stelsel wat wys slegs R200 is inbetaal.
Met dít alles agter die rug, sê Swanepoel so ewe: "Ek was ook nou in
die tronk . . . been there, done it."
Die Johannesburgse metropolisie het die dag 'n vét kans gevat toe
hulle mev. Erika Swanepoel wederregtelik by 'n padblokkade in hul wit
bussie geprop het. Sy het bewys wat baie vóór en ná haar nog net die
moed gehad het om onderlangs oor te mor.
Swanepoel het onlangs met 'n breë glimlag by die Johannesburgse
landdroshof uitgestap nadat sy 'n siviele saak teen die metropolisie
gewen het. Sy het hulle vir R100 000 gedagvaar nadat sy wederregtelik
in hegtenis geneem is.
Die saak is buite die hof geskik. Swanepoel wil egter nie die
skikkingsbedrag bekend maak nie. "Dit maak nie saak nie - dit maak wel
saak dat ek gewen het. Hulle het skuld erken deur buite die hof te
skik," sê sy.
Sy het ook die minister van veiligheid en sekuriteit gedagvaar, maar
dié saak laat vaar weens die uitgawes wat so 'n saak vir haar sou
inhou.
Toe Swanepoel op 30 Mei 2005 by 'n kruising tussen Lenasia en
Kliprivier voorgekeer is, kon sy nie dink dat sy in 'n oorvol sel in
die Johannesburg-sentraal-polisiekantoor sou beland nie. Nadat die
metropolisielid egter Swanepoel se rybewys geskandeer het, het dinge
begin skeefloop.
Swanepoel is sonder 'n dagvaarding saam met ander "oortreders" in 'n
bussie geprop vir 'n uitstaande boete.
Dié boete het sy egter reeds in Maart 2003 betaal, maar dit het nie op
die polisie se stelsel gewys nie.
Toe haar man vyf uur later die bewys van betaling bring, was die
metropolisielid se antwoord glo "dis nie geldig nie; ek kan dit nie
lees nie". Hulle moes 'n skulderkenningsboete van R300 plus die
"uitstaande boete" van R200 op die plek betaal.
Ná dié vernedering is Swanepoel op 'n soektog gestuur vir haar motor,
wat sonder haar toestemming van die toneel tot by die metropolisie se
kantore in Lovedaystraat bestuur is.
Swanepoel sou ook later uitvind slegs R200 van die R500 wat sy betaal
het, het 'n maand ná haar inhegtenisneming op die metropolisie se
stelsel gewys.
Sy wou op aandrang van haar prokureur seker maak die stelsel wys sy
het betaal, maar moes uitvind háár kwitansienommer vir R500 verskil
van dié op die stelsel wat wys slegs R200 is inbetaal.
Met dít alles agter die rug, sê Swanepoel so ewe: "Ek was ook nou in
die tronk . . . been there, done it."
'n Johannesburger wat kwaad was oor swak dienslewering het vandeesweek
'n toespraak onderbreek wat mnr. Mbhazima Shilowa, Gauteng se premier,
op Menseregtedag in Sharpeville gehou het.
'n Paar dae gelede het die maatskappy SA Brouerye (SAB) aangekondig hy
oorweeg dit om sy fabriek in Polokwane, Limpopo se hoofstad, te sluit
omdat daar probleme met die lewering van dienste is - onder meer
water.
Polokwane se munisipaliteit blameer 'n tekort en hoë verbruik, maar
die plaaslike dam is voller as dieselfde tyd verlede jaar en kenners
sê dit is eerder te wyte aan swak beplanning en vrot infrastruktuur.
In Gauteng is die chaos rondom toetse vir rybewyse steeds aan die
woed. Met net 'n week oor voordat daar oorgeskakel moet word na 'n
stelsel wat probleme met burokratiese bottelnekke moet oplos, weet die
provinsiale regering nog nie hoe groot die agterstand vir besprekings
is nie.
Dit is duidelik dat owerhede groot probleme met kapasiteit het, sowel
as met interne dissipline.
Dit lyk eenvoudig asof mense wat swak diens lewer of swak bestuur (wat
swak diens tot gevolg het) keer op keer ongestraf bly.
Die resultaat is 'n klaarblyklike kultuur van swak dissipline en
dienslewering wat in die openbare sektor posvat.
> From http://www.rhodesia.nl/truthlie.htm
TRUTH DISTORTED
Between September 1984 and August 1989, 771 people were necklaced or
doused with fuel and burnt to death. The myth perpetuated by the State
then was that this was an example of African brutality. The truth we
know now, is that this repulsive form of killing was first started by
white Rhodesian security forces in the 1970s and then brought to South
Africa by the security police. ...
This outrageous statement was made by presenter Max du Preez on the
SATV programme "Truth Commission Special Report" on 9 February 1997.
The Foundation's National Chairman, Ted Sutton-Pryce, lodged a
complaint with the Broadcasting Complaints Commission of South Africa
(BCCSA) regarding this statement, which followed footage of a woman
being burnt, stoned and kicked to death by a mob in South Africa. In
his letter to the BCCSA, Mr Sutton-Pryce wrote:
As an organisation which represents the interests of former Rhodesians
who have settled in South Africa, we take strong exception to this
statement and we wish to lodge a complaint against the SABC for what
we believe to be misrepresentation of the truth. We contend that the
statement referring to "white Rhodesian security forces" above is both
untrue and malicious. Necklacing (ie. the burning to death of selected
individuals, with the aid of inflammable liquid and/or motor tyres)
was never practised (let alone started) by the Rhodesian security
forces, black or white, and would have resulted in prosecution of the
perpetrators of such a dastardly act if it were ever discovered. The
allegation casts doubt on the integrity of all former members of the
Rhodesian security forces, and causes distress for their families and
friends. Mr Du Preez gave no indication as to the source of this
"truth" that he says "we know now". Neither was there any indication
in the programme that the "truth" came from testimony presented to the
Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
FEEDBACK
The BCCSA held a hearing on 14 March, at which the FLF was represented
by Mr Gordon Munro. Mr Max du Preez was not present, but the hearing
was attended by members of the SABC's complaints and legal offices.
BCCSA Chairman Professor J.C.W. van Rooyen S.C. was not satisfied with
the SABC's response to the FLF's complaint and he called upon the SABC
to provide further evidence to justify their stand. If the BCCSA is
still not satisfied, a further hearing could be scheduled for a later
date.
As this matter is at present considered sub-judice, the FLF does not
intend making any further public statements until the case has been
dealt with by the BCCSA. But Mr Du Preez has been interviewed since
the hearing by a reporter from the Mail and Guardian (25 Feb 97). We
felt that our members, especially those who might have viewed the SATV
programme in question or read about the case in the media, should know
that the National Managing Committee is prepared to react to media
reports that are blatantly untrue and malign the Rhodesian community
in South Africa.
This complaint came to us through a concerned member. If any member
hears or reads something that denigrates the Rhodesian community
unfairly, please send details to us as soon as possible so that the
National Managing Committee can consider it and perhaps respond
appropriately.
SAPA REPORT
June 16, 1997
SABC found guilty over claim about necklacing
The Broadcasting Complaints Commission of SA announced yesterday it
had found the SABC guilty of contravening the Broadcasting Code by
reporting that necklacing was started by white Rhodesian security
forces.
The finding follows a complaint by the Flame Lily Foundation about a
statement by Truth and Reconciliation Commission special report
presenter Max du Preez about necklacing.
"The truth, as we now know, is that this repulsive form of killing was
first started by white Rhodesian security forces in the 1970s and then
brought to South Africa by the security forces," Du Preez said on TV.
The commission came to the following conclusions:
There was no evidence that the SABC or Du Preez had acted from
malicious motives.
The commission had not, however, been provided with any evidence that
the alleged atrocities in (the then) Rhodesia of the 1970s included
the incineration of live people by necklacing.
Accordingly, the statement that these forms of incineration of people
originated from the Rhodesian security forces was not substantiated.
"The commission found that the SABC contravened the Broadcasting Code.
The Flame Lily Foundation's complaint was accordingly upheld
unanimously," the commission said. - Sapa.
Interestingly, Wits, not UJ, formerly known as RAU, is the university
playing host to "Verwagtings", a new Afrikaans play written by Deirdre
Venter and directed by André Stoltz.
This is a most interesting work. Focusing, as might be expected (bad pun)
on two pregnant women, one the abandoned owner of a farm, the other the
household help whose husband is in prison, this play looks at womanhood and
how women exist not just as women but as people within their societies.
With an earthy simplicity, this work breaks through language and racial
barriers in the curious way in which women are sometime women first and only
then ethnic and racial creatures. It is in the relationships between the
women that the interest in this work lies. The actual plot moves slowly
until shortly before the end when the mystery one knew existed is suitably
and plausibly explained.
The play stars Renate Stuurman whose character name eludes me, Elton Landrew
as Martinus, Louise Make as Miriam and Deidre Venter as Magadeleen. The
characters were finely drawn and beautifully portrayed. I entered into the
authenticity of the work, never doubting that such relationships could exist
regardless of the era in which the play is set.
Unfortunately the run is too short to make the play eligible for Naledis
otherwise it would be eligible for "Best New South African Play". The sets
were excellent, the costumes appropriate and the props scene enhancing, and
one was in no doubt that one was in the home of an impoverished farmer or
'bywoner', with my inaccurate guess having been the latter.
Supertaal
Blog
Soek
Hulp
Lede
Registreer
Teken aan
Tuis
RSS
