Tuis » Algemeen » Koeitjies & kalfies » Afrikaners is nie vry nie - Dan Roodt
| Afrikaners is nie vry nie - Dan Roodt [boodskap #81566] |
Do, 31 Julie 2003 17:35  |
Vusi
Boodskappe: 2211
Geregistreer: Februarie 2001
Karma: 0
|
Senior Lid |
|
|
Die volgende brief verskyn in die "Star" (30 Julie 2003) - vertaal en lees
self:
Afrikaners are not free (Dan Roodt - Dainfern)
Max du Preez ("Because they hate future, they try to change the past"), is
obviously worried, and we have not even begun to dissect the past.
In a poll conducted for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in late
2000, 65% of Afrikaners were found to believe "there were abuses but the
ideas behind apartheid were basically good". Twenty-five percent of Zulus
held the same opinion.
That dissenting majority of Afrikaners is perfectly right. No other white
group in history has done more for the education, health, languages and
culture of black Africans than they have.
The full story of development expenditure under apartheid has still to be
told. For their trouble Afrikan�ers have been accused of committing a "crime
against humanity".
For obviously ethnic reasons, the white English leftists have for decades
been spreading vicious lies and distortions about apartheid, including the
notion that it was a form of planned racial genocide.
Every Afrikaner was a Nazi, and when Eugene Terreblanche fell off his horse,
it all made sense. The black elite bought into this, and since 1994 it has
become the state religion.
The TRC report, also drafted by a left-wing English theologian, repre�sented
the ultimate propaganda tri�umph over us, casting the Nazi myth in stone and
even requiring us to submit ourselves to rituals of abject apology in a bad
remake of what hap�pened in Khmer Rouge labour camps.
The TRC report was a sham, and the state lost the Wouter Basson trial, the
last feeble attempt to make the genocide label stick. If it were possible
for a people to sue for libel, we would be able to claim billions in
damages, for we have been vilified, calumnied and vituperated beyond belief
by black politicians, theologians and their sleazy little rooinek henchmen.
I am afraid such good times are over.
The forgiveness that Afrikaners extended to the English community after 1910
for the genocide committed against our women and children during 1899-1902
is going to be revoked. Since 1994 black South Africa has treated us like a
conquered people, plundering our assets and taking over our schools and
universities, just like an occupying army from 17th-century Europe.
Where are all the English human rights lawyers now who used to have their
mouths full of venom about apartheid and congenital Afrikaner cruelty?
I think FW de Klerk should have the courage to testify in the Boeremag
trial. He cannot hide forever from the wrath of his people whom he sold out
for some cheap publicity and a Nobel Peace Prize.
De Klerk and Roelf Meyer were complete idiots, but it would be a mis�take to
see them as representative of the volk. Afrikaners are not so stupid as to
imagine that they are free.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Afrikaners is nie vry nie - Dan Roodt [boodskap #81588 is 'n antwoord op boodskap #81566] |
Vr, 01 Augustus 2003 02:48  |
Vusi
Boodskappe: 2211
Geregistreer: Februarie 2001
Karma: 0
|
Senior Lid |
|
|
"Jonas" skryf in boodskap news:bgbk1e$qks$1@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net...
> Die volgende brief verskyn in die "Star" (30 Julie 2003) - vertaal en lees
> self:
>
>
> Afrikaners are not free (Dan Roodt - Dainfern)
>
>
>
> Max du Preez ("Because they hate future, they try to change the past"), is
> obviously worried, and we have not even begun to dissect the past.
>
>
>
> In a poll conducted for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in late
> 2000, 65% of Afrikaners were found to believe "there were abuses but the
> ideas behind apartheid were basically good". Twenty-five percent of Zulus
> held the same opinion.
>
>
>
> That dissenting majority of Afrikaners is perfectly right. No other white
> group in history has done more for the education, health, languages and
> culture of black Africans than they have.
>
> The full story of development expenditure under apartheid has still to be
> told. For their trouble Afrikan�ers have been accused of committing a "crime
> against humanity".
>
>
>
> For obviously ethnic reasons, the white English leftists have for decades
> been spreading vicious lies and distortions about apartheid, including the
> notion that it was a form of planned racial genocide.
>
> Every Afrikaner was a Nazi, and when Eugene Terreblanche fell off his horse,
> it all made sense. The black elite bought into this, and since 1994 it has
> become the state religion.
>
> The TRC report, also drafted by a left-wing English theologian, repre�sented
> the ultimate propaganda tri�umph over us, casting the Nazi myth in stone and
> even requiring us to submit ourselves to rituals of abject apology in a bad
> remake of what hap�pened in Khmer Rouge labour camps.
>
>
>
> The TRC report was a sham, and the state lost the Wouter Basson trial, the
> last feeble attempt to make the genocide label stick. If it were possible
> for a people to sue for libel, we would be able to claim billions in
> damages, for we have been vilified, calumnied and vituperated beyond belief
> by black politicians, theologians and their sleazy little rooinek henchmen.
> I am afraid such good times are over.
>
>
>
> The forgiveness that Afrikaners extended to the English community after 1910
> for the genocide committed against our women and children during 1899-1902
> is going to be revoked. Since 1994 black South Africa has treated us like a
> conquered people, plundering our assets and taking over our schools and
> universities, just like an occupying army from 17th-century Europe.
>
>
>
> Where are all the English human rights lawyers now who used to have their
> mouths full of venom about apartheid and congenital Afrikaner cruelty?
>
>
>
> I think FW de Klerk should have the courage to testify in the Boeremag
> trial. He cannot hide forever from the wrath of his people whom he sold out
> for some cheap publicity and a Nobel Peace Prize.
>
> De Klerk and Roelf Meyer were complete idiots, but it would be a mis�take to
> see them as representative of the volk. Afrikaners are not so stupid as to
> imagine that they are free.
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
  |
Gaan na forum:
[ XML-voer ] [  ]
Tyd nou: Sa Nov 23 20:51:11 MGT 2024
|
Supertaal
Blog
Soek
Hulp
Lede
Registreer
Teken aan
Tuis
