stukkende gloeilamp [boodskap #57057] |
Do, 07 Februarie 2002 10:07 |
Threeships 'did you s
Boodskappe: 200 Geregistreer: November 2001
Karma: 0
|
Senior Lid |
|
|
hoeveel van jou sterreteken vat dit om `n stukkende gloeilamp om te
vervang?
ARIES: Just one. You want to make something of it?
TAURUS: One, but just try to convince them that the burned-out bulb is
useless and should be thrown away.
GEMINI: Two, but the job never gets done -- they just keep discussing
who is supposed to do it and how it's supposed to be done!
CANCER: Just one. But it takes a therapist three years to help them
through the grieving process.
LEO: Leos don't change light bulbs, although sometimes their agent
will get a Virgo in to do the job for them while they're out.
VIRGO: Approximately 1.000000 with an error of +/- one millionth.
LIBRA: Er, two. Or maybe one. No, on second thought, make that two. Is
that okay with you?
SCORPIO: That information is strictly secret and shared only with the
Enlightened Ones in the Star Chamber of the Ancient Hierarchical
Order.
SAGITTARIUS: The sun is shining, the day is young, we've got our whole
lives ahead of us, and you're inside worrying about a stupid
burned-out light bulb?
CAPRICORN: I don't waste my time with these childish jokes.
AQUARIUS: Well, you have to remember that everything is energy, so....
PISCES: Light bulb? What light bulb?
Threeships 'did you see that??' Mcduck
www.mothership.co.za
|
|
|
Re: stukkende gloeilamp [boodskap #57095 is 'n antwoord op boodskap #57057] |
Do, 07 Februarie 2002 18:40 |
Waaierstertmuis
Boodskappe: 1592 Geregistreer: Oktober 2001
Karma: 0
|
Senior Lid |
|
|
On Thu, 07 Feb 2002 12:07:28 +0200, Threeships 'did you see that?? '
Mcduck wrote:
> hoeveel van jou sterreteken vat dit om `n stukkende gloeilamp om te
> vervang?
> AQUARIUS: Well, you have to remember that everything is energy, so....
Wat nou? Waarom kry die arme waterdraers dit so swaar huh? :-))
(Gelukkig steur ek my maar min aan die tipe van goed - ek dink dis
strooi) Maar ek dink nie Astronomie en Astrologie van ouds is strooi
nie - net ons hedendaagse interpretasies daarvan.
|
|
|