Tuis » Algemeen » Koeitjies & kalfies » Re: Afrikaner Nuclear Weapon Update
| Re: Afrikaner Nuclear Weapon Update [boodskap #103467] |
Ma, 30 Mei 2005 07:41  |
Max
Boodskappe: 1496
Geregistreer: Februarie 2004
Karma: 0
|
Senior Lid |
|
|
Mens hoef nie verder te lees as die eerste paragraaf om te sien dat hierdie
outjie yl nie...
"Wolf" wrote in message
news:1117245738.737100.212510@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com.. .
> Dear Brothers and Sisters,
>
> Most white South Africans agree majority rule was a very
> big mistake and wish they had not voted for it. On the
> bright side, white South Africans with military expertise
> agree that white minority rule could be reinstated if the
> whites had nuclear weapons. The possibility of reinstating
> minority rule has not been seriously considered because
> of the difficulty in getting nuclear weapons.
>
> As it happens, there is an effective substitute for nuclear
> weapons. That is, Western hostages: hostages from Western
> European and North American countries. The Iranians were
> able to prevent the Americans putting down their revolution
> by holding staff at the American Embassy in Teheran hostage.
> It was just as though the Iranians had an atomic bomb.
> As a general rule, having 300 Western hostages is as good
> as having an atomic bomb for all practical purposes.
>
> It has been suggested the Iranians would not have succeeded
> in their revolution had there been a Republican government
> at the time. The conventional wisdom is George W. Bush
> could do something that Jimmy Carter could not do. Since
> the hostages were held at private homes, any action by
> the Republicans would have led to the hostages being killed.
>
> Perhaps George W. Bush could have dropped an atomic bomb on
> an Iranian city. If America was a dictatorship, this would
> be an effective response. But the American people wanted
> the hostages to be freed. Any action against Iran would
> have led to only perhaps a handful of hostages getting out
> alive. It would have been political suicide not to give in
> to the demands of the terrorists.
>
> There are a great number of expatriates from Western
> countries living in South Africa. They are concentrated
> in certain parts of certain cities, and it would be a
> simple matter to round up 300 of them in each of the main
> cities. Then one hostage can be shot every day unless the
> ANC move their forces out of the cities. This will allow
> a white regime to be set up as a precursor to a civil war.
>
> There are a number of important points. The hostages should
> not be held in one place, but secretly in private houses.
> Just as Bill Clinton didn't concern himself with the
> innocent people who got killed when he bombed Belgrade,
> so Afrikaners shouldn't become emotionally attached to the
> hostages. Maybe the hostages are really nice people.
> That is all the more reason why the West will not allow
> many of them to be killed.
>
> The ANC regime will close down the mobile phone system.
> Militants will need to communicate using UHF or VHF walkie
> talkies. The main risk to the operation is being betrayed.
> The operation by Sir Mark Thatcher in Equatorial Guinea
> came unstuck because the militants confided in men who
> they were sure they could rely on who had attended
> Catholic schools. Anyone who has gone to a Catholic
> school will support the ANC, but will give the impression
> of being "more Afrikaner than the Afrikaners". That is
> why Sir Mark Thatcher confided in them.
>
> This message is being posted to newsgroups, but will only
> appear for a short time, and will be taken down by the CIA.
> To make sure it gets to the right people, please e-mail it
> to anyone who you think might be interested.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolf Borman
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Afrikaner Nuclear Weapon Update [boodskap #103473 is 'n antwoord op boodskap #103467] |
Ma, 30 Mei 2005 09:19  |
Annette
Boodskappe: 11114
Geregistreer: Augustus 2003
Karma: 1
|
Senior Lid |
|
|
Paragraaf? Die eerste sin was al genoeg!
--
Groetnis
Annette
"Max" skryf in boodskap news:429ac4f5$0$20919$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> Mens hoef nie verder te lees as die eerste paragraaf om te sien dat hierdie
> outjie yl nie...
>
> "Wolf" wrote in message
> news:1117245738.737100.212510@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com.. .
>> Dear Brothers and Sisters,
>>
>> Most white South Africans agree majority rule was a very
>> big mistake and wish they had not voted for it. On the
>> bright side, white South Africans with military expertise
>> agree that white minority rule could be reinstated if the
>> whites had nuclear weapons. The possibility of reinstating
>> minority rule has not been seriously considered because
>> of the difficulty in getting nuclear weapons.
>>
>> As it happens, there is an effective substitute for nuclear
>> weapons. That is, Western hostages: hostages from Western
>> European and North American countries. The Iranians were
>> able to prevent the Americans putting down their revolution
>> by holding staff at the American Embassy in Teheran hostage.
>> It was just as though the Iranians had an atomic bomb.
>> As a general rule, having 300 Western hostages is as good
>> as having an atomic bomb for all practical purposes.
>>
>> It has been suggested the Iranians would not have succeeded
>> in their revolution had there been a Republican government
>> at the time. The conventional wisdom is George W. Bush
>> could do something that Jimmy Carter could not do. Since
>> the hostages were held at private homes, any action by
>> the Republicans would have led to the hostages being killed.
>>
>> Perhaps George W. Bush could have dropped an atomic bomb on
>> an Iranian city. If America was a dictatorship, this would
>> be an effective response. But the American people wanted
>> the hostages to be freed. Any action against Iran would
>> have led to only perhaps a handful of hostages getting out
>> alive. It would have been political suicide not to give in
>> to the demands of the terrorists.
>>
>> There are a great number of expatriates from Western
>> countries living in South Africa. They are concentrated
>> in certain parts of certain cities, and it would be a
>> simple matter to round up 300 of them in each of the main
>> cities. Then one hostage can be shot every day unless the
>> ANC move their forces out of the cities. This will allow
>> a white regime to be set up as a precursor to a civil war.
>>
>> There are a number of important points. The hostages should
>> not be held in one place, but secretly in private houses.
>> Just as Bill Clinton didn't concern himself with the
>> innocent people who got killed when he bombed Belgrade,
>> so Afrikaners shouldn't become emotionally attached to the
>> hostages. Maybe the hostages are really nice people.
>> That is all the more reason why the West will not allow
>> many of them to be killed.
>>
>> The ANC regime will close down the mobile phone system.
>> Militants will need to communicate using UHF or VHF walkie
>> talkies. The main risk to the operation is being betrayed.
>> The operation by Sir Mark Thatcher in Equatorial Guinea
>> came unstuck because the militants confided in men who
>> they were sure they could rely on who had attended
>> Catholic schools. Anyone who has gone to a Catholic
>> school will support the ANC, but will give the impression
>> of being "more Afrikaner than the Afrikaners". That is
>> why Sir Mark Thatcher confided in them.
>>
>> This message is being posted to newsgroups, but will only
>> appear for a short time, and will be taken down by the CIA.
>> To make sure it gets to the right people, please e-mail it
>> to anyone who you think might be interested.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Wolf Borman
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Afrikaner Nuclear Weapon Update [boodskap #103477 is 'n antwoord op boodskap #103473] |
Ma, 30 Mei 2005 09:46 |
Deneile
Boodskappe: 202
Geregistreer: Julie 2006
Karma: 0
|
Senior Lid |
|
|
Wie is Wolf Borman? 'n Wit Wolf? Miskien moet ons die drie varkies kry om
hom uit te sort!
"Annette" skryf in boodskap news:d7em6j$aeg$1@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net...
> Paragraaf? Die eerste sin was al genoeg!
> --
> Groetnis
> Annette
> "Max" wrote in message
> news:429ac4f5$0$20919$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>> Mens hoef nie verder te lees as die eerste paragraaf om te sien dat
> hierdie
>> outjie yl nie...
>> "Wolf" wrote in message
>> news:1117245738.737100.212510@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com.. .
>>> Dear Brothers and Sisters,
>>>
>>> Most white South Africans agree majority rule was a very
>>> big mistake and wish they had not voted for it. On the
>>> bright side, white South Africans with military expertise
>>> agree that white minority rule could be reinstated if the
>>> whites had nuclear weapons. The possibility of reinstating
>>> minority rule has not been seriously considered because
>>> of the difficulty in getting nuclear weapons.
>>>
>>> As it happens, there is an effective substitute for nuclear
>>> weapons. That is, Western hostages: hostages from Western
>>> European and North American countries. The Iranians were
>>> able to prevent the Americans putting down their revolution
>>> by holding staff at the American Embassy in Teheran hostage.
>>> It was just as though the Iranians had an atomic bomb.
>>> As a general rule, having 300 Western hostages is as good
>>> as having an atomic bomb for all practical purposes.
>>>
>>> It has been suggested the Iranians would not have succeeded
>>> in their revolution had there been a Republican government
>>> at the time. The conventional wisdom is George W. Bush
>>> could do something that Jimmy Carter could not do. Since
>>> the hostages were held at private homes, any action by
>>> the Republicans would have led to the hostages being killed.
>>>
>>> Perhaps George W. Bush could have dropped an atomic bomb on
>>> an Iranian city. If America was a dictatorship, this would
>>> be an effective response. But the American people wanted
>>> the hostages to be freed. Any action against Iran would
>>> have led to only perhaps a handful of hostages getting out
>>> alive. It would have been political suicide not to give in
>>> to the demands of the terrorists.
>>>
>>> There are a great number of expatriates from Western
>>> countries living in South Africa. They are concentrated
>>> in certain parts of certain cities, and it would be a
>>> simple matter to round up 300 of them in each of the main
>>> cities. Then one hostage can be shot every day unless the
>>> ANC move their forces out of the cities. This will allow
>>> a white regime to be set up as a precursor to a civil war.
>>>
>>> There are a number of important points. The hostages should
>>> not be held in one place, but secretly in private houses.
>>> Just as Bill Clinton didn't concern himself with the
>>> innocent people who got killed when he bombed Belgrade,
>>> so Afrikaners shouldn't become emotionally attached to the
>>> hostages. Maybe the hostages are really nice people.
>>> That is all the more reason why the West will not allow
>>> many of them to be killed.
>>>
>>> The ANC regime will close down the mobile phone system.
>>> Militants will need to communicate using UHF or VHF walkie
>>> talkies. The main risk to the operation is being betrayed.
>>> The operation by Sir Mark Thatcher in Equatorial Guinea
>>> came unstuck because the militants confided in men who
>>> they were sure they could rely on who had attended
>>> Catholic schools. Anyone who has gone to a Catholic
>>> school will support the ANC, but will give the impression
>>> of being "more Afrikaner than the Afrikaners". That is
>>> why Sir Mark Thatcher confided in them.
>>>
>>> This message is being posted to newsgroups, but will only
>>> appear for a short time, and will be taken down by the CIA.
>>> To make sure it gets to the right people, please e-mail it
>>> to anyone who you think might be interested.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Wolf Borman
>>>
>
|
|
|
|
| |
  |
Gaan na forum:
[ XML-voer ] [  ]
Tyd nou: Sa Mei 18 23:02:28 MGT 2024
|
Supertaal
Blog
Soek
Hulp
Lede
Registreer
Teken aan
Tuis
